GRE Analytical Writing Topics
- Analyze an Issue
- Analyze an Argument
Analyze an Issue TaskThe 'issue' task presents an opinion on a topic of general interest, which is followed by specific instructions on how to respond to that issue. The 'issue' task assesses your ability to think critically, while also evaluating your skills at clearly expressing your thoughts about the topic, in writing. Each topic in the ‘Issue Task’ makes a claim that can be discussed from several different perspectives and applied to diverse situations or conditions. You are required to present a compelling case to justify your own position or stand on the issue.
What is important for you to understand is that unlike the verbal and quantitative reasoning sections, there is no right answer in the AWA section. In fact, as far as the raters are concerned, there is not even a pre-defined correct position to take. You will be assessed only on the skill and logic with which you address the specific topics while sticking to the instructions. The raters evaluate your ability to articulate and develop an argument to support your evaluation of the issue.
Sample Issue TaskIn order to understand the ‘issue task’ better, let us consider a sample issue task and its response. The following is a sample issue task that you might see on the test:
As you have seen in this sample issue task response, you have been asked to discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the given statement. While your response may vary from strong agreement to strong disagreement or qualified agreement to qualified disagreement, you must explain the reasoning behind your response and consider how the statement might or might not hold true. The essay above, rather than simply agreeing or disagreeing with the statement, presents an insightful position by providing examples and evidence to support the argument. The writer, throughout the essay, conveys ideas fluently using effective vocabulary and sentence variety, providing a solid reasoning for his views on the matter.
It is therefore clear, that the issue task tests your ability to think critically about a given topic and your ability to express your thoughts clearly in writing.
Analyze an Issue TaskThe argument task evaluates your ability to understand, analyze and assess arguments according to specific instructions and express your evaluation clearly in writing. An argument task consists of a brief passage in which the author makes a case for some course of action or interpretation of events by presenting claims supported by reasons and evidence to back any claims made. The task at hand in the argument essay is to discuss the logical soundness of the argument, instead of agreeing or disagreeing with the position it presents. This requires a critical examination of the author’s line of reasoning and use of evidence.
The Argument task requires you to demonstrate your critical thinking, perceptive reading, and analytical writing skills.
Sample Argument TaskLet us have a look at a sample argument task. Following is a sample argument task that you might see on the test.
In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up the Mason River. The use of the river for water sports is therefore sure to increase. The city government should, for that reason, devote more money in this year's budget to riverside recreational facilities.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Sample argument essay:
While it may be true that the Mason City government ought to devote more money to riverside recreational facilities, this author's argument does not make a cogent case for increased resources based on river use. It is easy to understand why city residents would want a cleaner river, but this argument is rife with holes and assumptions, and thus, not strong enough to lead to increased funding.
Citing surveys of city residents, the author reports the residents' love of water sports. The scope and validity of that survey, however, are not entirely clear. For example, the survey could have asked residents if they preferred using the river for water sports or would rather like to see a hydroelectric dam built instead. The sample may not have been representative of the entire city's residents, asking only those residents who live upon the river. The survey may have been 10 pages long, with 2 questions dedicated to river sports. We just do not know. Unless the survey is fully representative, valid, and reliable, it can not be used to effectively back the author's argument.
Additionally, the author implies that residents do not use the river for swimming, boating, and fishing, despite their professed interest, because the water is polluted and smelly. While a polluted, smelly river would likely cut down on river sports, a concrete connection between the resident's lack of river use and the river's current state is not effectively made. Though there have been complaints, we do not know if there have been numerous complaints from a wide range of people, or perhaps from one or two individuals who made numerous complaints. To strengthen his/her argument, the author would benefit from implementing a normalized survey asking a wide range of residents why they do not currently use the river.
Building upon the implication that residents do not use the river due to the quality of the river's water and the smell, the author suggests that a river clean-up drive will result in its increased usage for recreational activities. If the river's water quality and smell result from problems which can be cleaned, this may be true. For example, if the decreased water quality and aroma is caused by pollution by factories along the river, this conceivably could be remedied. But if the quality and aroma results from the natural mineral deposits in the water or surrounding rock, this may not be true. There are some bodies of water which emit a strong smell of sulphur due to the geography of the area. This is not something likely to be affected by a clean-up. Consequently, a river clean up may have no impact upon river usage. Regardless of whether the river's quality is able to be improved or not, the author does not effectively show a connection between water quality and river usage.
A clean, beautiful, safe river often adds to a city's property values, leads to increased tourism and revenue from those who come to take advantage of the river, and a better overall quality of life for residents. For these reasons, the government may decide to invest in improving riverside recreational facilities. However, this author's argument is not likely to significantly persuade the city government to allocate increased funding for the same. This sample argument essay follows the task directions and gives a clear picture by specifically detailing the impact that different pieces of evidence would have on the argument. The variation in sentence structure, use of effective vocabulary, and precise analysis of facts presented by the test taker, make this essay an insightful one.
Timing and Time Management
You are allotted 30 minutes for each essay. Writing a 500-word essay within 30 minutes might seem to be a daunting task. However, writing an essay, and a good one, within 30 minutes is possible if you know how to manage your time efficiently.